AFBCMR
1500 West Perimeter Road
Joint Base Andrews NAF Washington, MD 20762-7002
Dear :
This is in response to your DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military Record,
dated, February 27, 2014, which is essentially a request for reconsideration of your application
for correction of your military records, AFBCMR Docket Number BC-1994-10281.
We have examined your recent application and, inasmuch as it contains essentially a
similar request which was previously considered and denied by the Board and you have provided
no new relevant evidence, we find that it does not meet the criteria for reconsideration by the
Board. Once a case has been considered and denied by the Board established by law for that
purpose, reconsideration is authorized only where newly discovered relevant evidence is
presented which was not available when the application was originally submitted. Additionally,
the reiterations of facts previously addressed by the Board, uncorroborated personal
observations, or additional arguments on the evidence of record are also not grounds for
reopening a case.
Absent judicial action, the Air Force considers your AFBCMR decision final. Any future
correspondence from you on this issue will be filed without action. However, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. § 701, et. seq. and 28 U.S.C. § 1491, Congress authorizes applicants to pursue final
AFBCMR decisions through the U.S. Court of Claims or appropriate U.S. District Court. Those
Federal Courts have the authority to set aside AFBCMR decisions if they find them to be
arbitrary or capricious. I know this might not be the answer you were seeking, but, no further
action on your application will be taken.
Sincerely,
AF | BCMR | CY1989 | BC 1989 00444
AFBCMR 1500 West Perimeter Road Joint Base Andrews NAF Washington, MD 20762-6604 Dear : This is in response to your DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military Record, dated August 24, 2013 which is essentially a request for reconsideration of your application for correction of your military records, AFBCMR Docket Number BC-1989-00444. As you are aware on June 9, 1989, the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records considered your request to upgrade your dishonorable...
AF | BCMR | CY1994 | BC-1994-02702
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit U. Nor does Sergeant K------s memo address the existence of any witness statements. Exhibit P. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 10 Sep 01.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 02405 2
The entry in his official medical records, dated 20 Sep 65, stating his headaches were relieved by proper eyeglasses in 1965 be changed to read Headaches from Dec 1961 to 1 Oct 65. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants original request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit F. On 3 Jun 10, the Board notified the applicant that a subsequent, undated, request for reconsideration by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02989
On behalf of the applicant, an accredited veterans administration claims agent/veterans advocate, indicated subsequent to the Boards original decision, he was diagnosed with an aggravated chronic mental health condition and was awarded a combined compensable disability rating of 50 percent (Major Depressive Disorder) by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA). In this respect, we note that while the two supporting statements indicate the applicant suffers from major depressive disorder...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2007-00364-3
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants request, and the rationale of the earlier decisions of the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibits F and H. By letter, dated 2 Aug 09, the applicants counsel states two issues in the applicants case have yet to be addressed: 1. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 00364 3
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants request, and the rationale of the earlier decisions of the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibits F and H. By letter, dated 2 Aug 09, the applicants counsel states two issues in the applicants case have yet to be addressed: 1. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03600
However, the Air Force will not include the Vietnam location on his DD Form 214. We have thoroughly reviewed the evidence of record and considered the weight and relevance of the additional documentation provided by the applicant, and whether or not it was discoverable at the time of any previous application. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the additional evidence presented did not meet the criteria for reconsideration by the Board; and the application will only be...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-1989-01497A
In a letter, dated 23 December 2002, the applicant was advised that inasmuch as his request contained essentially the same request that was previously considered and denied by the Board and he had provided no new relevant evidence, it did not meet the criteria for reconsideration by the Board (Exhibit H). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the additional documentation submitted by the applicant, we are not persuaded that a change to his characterization of service...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1992-01342-2
The AFBCMR Staff assumed the applicant was referring to his most recent case (BC-2004-02624), which was denied on 27 Dec 04, and in a letter dated 3 May 06 (Exhibit K), requested he provide copies of documents he alluded to his 14 Feb 06 submission. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After reviewing the applicant’s latest submissions, a majority of the Board reconsidered his appeal but found the documentation insufficient to...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1981-02400-2
In a letter received on 3 April 1995, counsel requested reconsideration of the application and provided additional documentation, consisting of declarations from Lieutenant General “B”, and Colonels “S” and “K”, indicating the Board’s 1992 decision was erroneous. By letter, dated 15 September 2005, counsel provided a copy of the 12 September 2005 remand order from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia directing the applicant’s request for direct promotion be remanded to the...